Proposal #5: Under 25?
I propose a change in Junior Branch's terms of reference that excludes the age limit of 25 years old.
Rationale:
Junior Branch has never, in fact, been an age group. It has always been a life-style, a way of seeing things in CISV, a group of people, a community or even a think-tank. None of these things (and the other ones you can think about) depends on age.
CISV is an organization that, in its essence, is against prejudice. Considering this, to assume that everyone over 25 don't fit the community Junior Branch is just... prejudice. There are many people that are more then 25 that can really benefit the community and CISV as a whole participating in Junior Branch. I' m sure you can think about an example. Why just kick people out when they can still contribute to accomplish the goals?
Junior Branch has got concepts clear enough to allow some freedom in the structure. Maybe some changes on the terms of reference would be needed to keep the group tight, but that's easy.
This proposal would enable people to be more active in discussions and questioning CISV's habits at the same time they work in regular committees, if they are interested. Why not through more people, more ideas on this community? This would also touch the "double structure" issue, enabling people to participate in the part of the organization they feel home, regardless the age.
Marcos (BRA)
